Home › New Nanos National Poll - CP, 32%, LP 30%, NDP ...
New Nanos National Poll - CP, 32%, LP 30%, NDP 20%, GP 10%, BQ 9%
The first post election poll by Nanos Research shows a tightening of the margin between the Conservatives and the Liberals. The initial change may suggest that the Prime Minister’s comments relating to a possible deficit may not necessarily be resonating well among core Conservative supporters in Western Canada. The Dion resignation may have made the Liberals a temporary parking spot for disaffected Conservatives.
The detailed tables with the regional sub-tabs and methodology are posted on our website at: http://www.nanosresearch.com.
Methodology
Polling between November 11 and November 15, 2008. (Random Telephone Survey of 1,000 Canadians, 18 years of age and older). A survey of 1,000 Canadians is accurate to within 3.1 percentage points, plus or minus, 19 times out of 20.
Ballot Question: For those parties you would consider voting for federally, could you please rank your top two current local preferences? (Committed Voters Only - First Choice)
The numbers in parenthesis denote the change from the Federal Election.
Committed Voters - Canada (N=865, MoE ± 3.4%, 19 times out of 20)
- Conservative Party 32% (-6)
- Liberal Party 30% (+4)
- NDP 20% (+2)
- Green Party 10% (+3)
- BQ 9% (-1)
(*Note: Undecided 14%)
Committed Voters - Western Canada (N=299, MoE ± 5.7%, 19 times out of 20)
- Conservative Party 38% (-14)
- Liberal Party 27% (+11)
- NDP 23% (+1)
- Green Party 13% (+5)
(*Note: Undecided 14%)
What do you think?
Cheers, NJN
Remember to rate the views of others - to allow us to recognize the opinion leaders in our national conversation.
Individuals with the top ratings make it to Nik’s Leaderboard
|
Most Read Comments
Highest Rated Comments
Honestly - i think conservative supporters just don't answer telephone polls as ... more
Foxer (British Columbia) 19 Nov 16:51
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081118.weconomy19/BNStory/p... more
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post) (Ontario) 19 Nov 17:26
Well well it appears that Canadians are having second thoughts about Harper and ... more
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post) (Ontario) 19 Nov 16:46
Here's a report by the Commons guy who was appointed by Harper and has given /fl... more
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post) (Ontario) 21 Nov 01:06
Ill informed...there was not one partisan comment in those remarks above. The fa... more
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post) (Ontario) 21 Nov 09:28
Bernie:---The Opposition is the "government in waiting" and they do not like to ... more
Tom Good (British Columbia) 21 Nov 15:09
Comments
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post)
Well well it appears that Canadians are having second thoughts about Harper and his band of incompetent clowns. The very fact that Liberal supporters sat on their hands in the last election was of some comfort to me because they didn't and couldn't vote for Harper or lyin Jack, the greens, etc.
And with the Libs getting a NEW LEADER they should get lots or press while the economy goes down the tubes from Tory mismanagement.
I believe the Libs will try and topple the cons b/f the end of this year.
[updated Wed Nov 19 16:46:50 EST 2008]
19 Nov 16:46
12 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Foxer
Honestly - i think conservative supporters just don't answer telephone polls as much between elections. This is about what we saw from nic's numbers just before the election - where suddenly they jumped up and stayed fairly high thru the election, and now nosedive back to where they've been for a while.
It is interesting to note that almost every pollster missed calling this election badly.
I think that there's going to have to be a serious rethink about how we conduct polls to gain better accuracy. I have seen absolutely zero increase in liberal support around here, nor have i heard of any anywhere else, nor is there really an event that would tend to suggest there should be (other than dion quitting, which admittedly might bump them up a bit. The guy was an albatross around their neck).
Something's changed, and we're just not seeing the kind of accuracy we used to. Perhaps voters are just more volitile, or perhaps more people refuse to take polls.
[updated Wed Nov 19 16:51:07 EST 2008]
19 Nov 16:51
25 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Lex Llewdor
There could also be a pettern, here. Look at the 2006 results:
CPC: 36.3
LPC: 30.2
NDP: 17.5
Three weeks later, Nik's poll found this:
CPC: 33
LPC: 34
NDP: 18
It makes sense to me that the supporters of the losing side would get really upset about it, while the winners would be complacent.
I'd check the 2004 results, too, but my source for polling data doesn't go back that far.
[updated Wed Nov 19 20:07:20 EST 2008]
19 Nov 20:07
Foxer
Good point as well. It just doesn't seem to be entirely accurate.
[updated Wed Nov 19 20:19:39 EST 2008]
19 Nov 20:19
RonaldODowd
Foxer,
I can only speak for myself. I vote one way and may or may not reveal my true intention to the pollster, if called.
My dad used to say it was confidential how he intended to vote...but in reality he never did anything at the federal level but vote Tory!
[updated Wed Nov 19 21:27:33 EST 2008]
19 Nov 21:27
RonaldODowd
Foxer,
One more thing. My dad's been dead for almost two (2) years now but the tag team of Doug and Irwin are still hitting him up for money. It did no good advising the party on at least two occasions that he had passed on.
If the world ever blows up, I can rest at peace knowing that the CPC fundraising machine will still be hard at work chiseling for money, much to the prononced annoyance of most of my Conservative friends! (As one of them said, you suddenly exist when they are diving for dollars but as soon as you want something -- they haven't a clue that you exist...)
[updated Wed Nov 19 21:39:30 EST 2008]
19 Nov 21:39
Foxer
Heh - the tories are better ad putting people on lists than they are at taking them off, that's for sure.
I've certainly found the tories around when I had an interest to talk about, and i don't give them any significant money. And that's generally been my experience in talking to others, whether they give money or not. Are your friends in toronto or something?
As to the voting intentions thing - yeah i know what you mean. And i know a lot of tory supporters who really tend towards the 'hang up if anyone calls' side of things, and even a few who say 'liberal' to give a 'false sense of security' to that party (tho that was mostly a 'dion' thing )
Conservatives by nature don't like to be bugged - they'd rather not get calls in the first place i think. When an election rolls around - different story.
Just seems odd that the numbers would jump so much right at the beginning of an election and right after like that. SOMETHING is up, you can't tell me close to 10 percent of the population changes it's mind overnight like that, especially two times in two different elections.
[updated Wed Nov 19 22:08:14 EST 2008]
19 Nov 22:08
RonaldODowd
Foxer,
[wink] You know how we are in Quebec!
We're thinking, it's high time to belly up to the trough after many a generous financial contribution but it seems that the western mentality is something different...ah, what nostalgia for Brian and the good ole days. (Remember what he said about the living, breathing Tories when he didn't realize that the mike was live!) Now that's a man we could relate to here in Quebec.
[updated Wed Nov 19 22:17:06 EST 2008]
19 Nov 22:17
Foxer
hehehehe - well in some ways Quebec and the west are very similar. In some ways tho we're very different :)
[updated Wed Nov 19 22:18:33 EST 2008]
19 Nov 22:18
Joanne P.
AGREE...also, byelections, Provincial party candidate elections, municipal elections have all been held in BC the past few weeks....maxing out any interest in elections ...period. The Quebec election naturally controls negative comments to Ottawa. I don't think any poll at this point in time is of any value, except to help the news media have something negative to talk about, as that is their only purpose. No government could or can change the world economic situation overnight...everyone thought the US would pull themselves out of thier mess with their massive buyouts....but didn't happen.
[updated Thu Nov 20 12:34:28 EST 2008]
20 Nov 12:34
hollinm
Joanne P. It is absolutely scary the amount of money the U.S. is talking about infusing into their economy or subsidizing the financial sector. This ship can't and won't be turned around quickly.
However, the great messiah, the one who walks on water, will be inaugurated come Jan. 20th and all will be sweetness and light. At least that's what the syncophant media wants the U.S. people and the world at large to believe.
Until some confidence is restored there will be no rebound in world markets. The stock market is emotionally driven and until investors see some light at the end of the tunnel the world economy will continue to struggle.
In Canada we are along for the ride. There is nothing the government can do to fix the world economy but they can take prudent measures to stimulate the Canadian economy. Bailouts are not the answer and if the pecksniffian automakers think that a bridge loan is the answer I think the goverment will have a different message.
[updated Thu Nov 20 15:55:33 EST 2008]
20 Nov 15:55
Regardless of idealogy, the hope of the Americans for "change" from the current direction is great to witness.
Will the Democrats led by OBAMA really change the direction and will the world allow the ONLY superpower to reshape the new world order will be very interesting.
Like Harper and Obama, I will hold my hopes for all the parties to find common interest and ground to tackle the problems.
I don't think we will be in for a short and shallow drop in trade with our US partner.
Fasten your seatbelts!!
[updated Thu Nov 20 16:57:54 EST 2008]
20 Nov 16:57
hollinm
Informed1...
The pressure on Obama will be significant. If things don't change rather quickly the knives will come out from all sides of the U.S. government and the American people who are expecting significant change will be disappointed to put it mildly.
I wouldn't want to be in Obama's shoes. However, I do wish him well and want him to succeed. Canada needs him to succeed and so does the world.
[updated Thu Nov 20 23:08:40 EST 2008]
20 Nov 23:08
The "scopes" from all those new guns are already out. All he can do is ask those who supported him and those who did not to make some very difficult choices in the next few months and years.
I don't think a return of confidence,consumerism will turn things around within the first 6-12 months.
Recession, Depression?
Canadian Banks are now showing first signs of "substantial credit losses" let's see if they continue to hold and refuse to lend after the infusions and rate drops.
If the Banks won't lend to the Detroit 3 why would the taxpayer?
Without the Banks lending we can not get the consumer acting like a consumer.
Too many lines of credit, mortgages, credit cards are being "red flagged" by their departments.
Taxpayers without problems are holding on to their cash as fear of job losses and recession, pension losses are played everyday in the news.
I don't see any Good News on the economy.
The Doom and Gloom Mantra is taking hold and gathering steam.
[updated Fri Nov 21 08:04:51 EST 2008]
21 Nov 08:04
hollinm
Informed 1
I agree the gloom and doom scenario is playing out and the stockmarket is reacting. We will see when Obama gets into office what will happen.
Watching the automaker, the parts industries and now the dealer association crying for assistance is a sight to behold. They allowed their own industry to whither on the vine without taking any concrete actions and now they are crying to be saved by the taxpayers of Canada. It is breathtaking to watch the sniffling.
You are right the banks will tighten up their credit criteria as is prudent given the economic circumstances the country, consumers and businesses are facing. Again you hit the nail on the head if automakers can not sell the cars they are manufacturing why would any prudent lender provide working capital assistance. With the major automakers having share values of $2.00 in value there is little book value to leverage any longer.
So why should the taxpayers foot the bill? It is not the government that needs to come up with a rescue plan but the auto industry itself. Present the plan, convince governments they will do what they say and that they can be viable over the LONG term.
[updated Fri Nov 21 12:10:27 EST 2008]
21 Nov 12:10
Agreed, they are shooting themselves in the foot. The Union and the management have sown the seeds for their own destruction and taxpayers will be picking up the bill compliments of legislation passed by Bob Rae in Ontario to fund the pension shortfall. It could be in the billions, McGuinty must be loving Bob right about now.
Don't Cry For Me Argentina lyrics
[Eva:]
It won't be easy, you'll think it strange
When I try to explain how I feel
That I still need your love after all that I've done
You won't believe me
All you will see is a girl you once knew
Although she's dressed up to the nines
At sixes and sevens with you
I had to let it happen, I had to change
Couldn't stay all my life down at heel
Looking out of the window, staying out of the sun
So I chose freedom
Running around, trying everything new
But nothing impressed me at all
I never expected it to
[Chorus:]
Don't cry for me Argentina
The truth is I never left you
All through my wild days
My mad existence
I kept my promise
Don't keep your distance
And as for fortune, and as for fame
I never invited them in
Though it seemed to the world they were all I desired
They are illusions
They are not the solutions they promised to be
The answer was here all the time
I love you and hope you love me
Don't cry for me Argentina
[chorus]
Have I said too much?
There's nothing more I can think of to say to you.
But all you have to do is look at me to know
That every word is true
Just replace girl with GM, makes me well up inside those poor SOB's with their pension and bonuses no longer available.
Evil taxpayers! How dare they not support us!
[updated Fri Nov 21 12:58:56 EST 2008]
21 Nov 12:58
hollinm
Informed1
Thanks for the lyrics.
The automakers are going to reap what they sew here in Canada because I do not think Harper is going to just bail them out. If he does there will be so many strings attached they never will get access to the money.
I hear GM may go into prearranged bankruptcy protection. In other words not the formal chapter 9 in the U.S. but everything will be arranged ahead of time. We will see how that scenario plays out.
There is not much sympathy for the auto industry here in Canada or I suspect the U.S. So the politicians know what the mood of the public is and if they do invest imprudently and the car companies come back for more money or they spend it like AIG in the States did there will be a significant backlash.
The government is better off providing extra benefits for the unemployed workers to bridge the time until they get another job or to provide re-training to make them better equipped to get another job. Some of these workers have nothing more than high school education and they will have to be prepared for another job if they are going to stay in the work force.
As for the stink bomb Rae left McGuinty well this will come out in the next couple of days and it will sink Bob Rae's chances of becoming Liberal leader. I hear Ontario is on the hook for $3 billion for GM and another $1 billion for Ford and Chyrsler. Boob Rae was one terrible premier and his record is going to be revisited time and again and no matter how he tries to explain it people will not be happy.
[updated Fri Nov 21 23:20:35 EST 2008]
21 Nov 23:20
The expression "the Devil in the details" will come back to haunt most politicians who give short term fixes to buy votes or prop idealogy.
[updated Sat Nov 22 07:14:53 EST 2008]
22 Nov 07:14
Lex Llewdor
Look at history.
These credit crises happen pretty regularly. Over the past 300 years (the period in which we've had major stock markets available to measure this stuff), a credit crisis has happened, on average, every 6-8 years.
We have a ton of data with which to compare what's happening now, and what's happening now looks a lot like the 1987 S&L crisis. We should see economic growth again in Q2 of 2009.
This won't drag out and be an unmitigated disaster. This is more that just a blip - this is a major correction - but it's not anything collapsing that we can't put back together in short order.
[updated Fri Nov 21 14:37:56 EST 2008]
21 Nov 14:37
I am not confident that the Detroit -3 will be coming back with Union concessions to reflect the value of their product.
Like off brands, Detroit 3 do not have the "loyal customers" to demand the prices they need to pay for their costs of production.
Consumers decide the winners, check IPOD, IPHONE, Wii, those products are not the cheapest and are outselling their competitors.
Using tax dollars to keep the Detroit 3 and their Unions is not necessary.
[updated Fri Nov 21 14:54:41 EST 2008]
21 Nov 14:54
Lex Llewdor
I agree.
In fact, I think letting GM fail now will get us economic growth back sooner.
Sure, the next 4 months will be awful in GM goes down, and literally millions of people will lost their jobs, but that will speed the market correction in housing prices, and then we can starting building wealth again.
[updated Fri Nov 21 15:16:53 EST 2008]
21 Nov 15:16
Agreed. Harper shoud send Layton to negotiate the Auto bailout package.
It would only cost the taxpayer about $ 200,000 per car after he is done.
[updated Fri Nov 21 15:30:30 EST 2008]
21 Nov 15:30
Lex Llewdor
"i think conservative supporters just don't answer telephone polls"
I certainly don't. I'm a busy guy. I screen my calls and only answer when I know who's calling and actively want to speak with him.
[updated Fri Nov 21 14:34:24 EST 2008]
21 Nov 14:34
The recent NEWS will always weigh against the government in place. Regardless of this poll, when given a choice between the Liberal and the CPC it's a no brainer.
Given that the CPC are acting is a much more concillatory approach looking for help from the opposition, keeping ministers in the mix with the media, the old style of opposition will quickly seen as bitter and whiny.
Look for more of 39th session drama from NDP, Bloc and Liberals. Either way Harper will get his bills through again.
[updated Fri Nov 21 14:58:37 EST 2008]
21 Nov 14:58
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post)
The cons are sucking up because they know thye are on thin ground.....lets not get all dramatic here. They are not popular and they know it.
[updated Fri Nov 21 17:54:29 EST 2008]
21 Nov 17:54
ROFL, this is the best you can come up with? Really?
The fact like Meet the PM for tea and cooperation request before the press was missed by the opposition does not suprise me.
The fact is your party like the others are given a wonderful gift and provide INPUT to the government. The fact they can offer nothing of substance and will simply attack and not show up shows why they had the worst showing in 100 years. They don't know when to shut up or put up.
Now it's time to put up and cooperate in a non-partisan manner, but like your fellow chattering elitists who want to hear their speeches in the HOC, they will find the CPC offer pragmatic ideas you can vote against in non-confidence and bring down this (evil incomptent government) GO AHEAD pull that TRIGGER, otherwise sit down and just smile and pretend you care about this country. ROFL
Alot of hot air again. Don't you get it. Harper is allowing the Liberals some breathing space because of the global crisis. Too bad you are stuck in a idealogical war by yourself. LOL
Attack than roll over. Bet on it. It worked out so well last time. 43 times. Going for 50 this sitting?
[updated Fri Nov 21 18:28:23 EST 2008]
21 Nov 18:28
Taylor Cutforth
Yep.
They're too busy being productive by living their lives and individually making a difference in their own personal situations and for those around them.
They don't wait for government(s) to get things done for them, they take action within their communities and lives to not only adapt but to what things they know to be right in order to improve things around them. Its not the job of government to be everything to everyone and to see all things or know all things especially since they are just human like you and I and subject to flaws whatever they may be. What matters is that people don't let such things hold them back from making a real difference.
Thats what progressive Canadians do and it is what we naturally tend to do as human beings.
I see it all the time now much more than what I used to... naturally if you surround yourself with good people who do good things it begins to rub off on you if you allow it.
(same can go vice-versa with what is not good.)
I have never been called and I don't know of any one who has, especially of any of the people I know who happen to follow Canadian politics (or not). No doubt, its usually the "nots" out there who pickup even when they know they don't keep up with what goes on in the HOC and elsewhere, only follow what the headlines or their "friends" tell them through hearsay.
[updated Sun Nov 23 15:11:10 EST 2008]
23 Nov 15:11
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post)
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081118.weconomy19/BNStory/politics/home
"OTTAWA — Jim Flaherty may be set to become the first federal finance minister in nearly 40 years to oversee a return to budget deficits,"
IHS Global Insight Canada managing director Dale Orr said Mr. Flaherty and the Conservatives should have taken better precautions against a deficit, noting they cut some rainy-day cushions and drove program spending up 13.8 per cent in their first two years.
It's also hard to find an economist who supports the Conservatives' decision to forgo $11-billion of annual revenue and cut the goods and services tax by two points, instead of using that fiscal room for productivity-enhancing, broad-based income-tax cuts.
That notwithstanding, Mr. Orr said, he believes Mr. Flaherty “is certainly the best person in the Conservative cabinet to be the finance minister.”
"If Ottawa runs a deficit in the 2009-2010 fiscal year, as bank economists have predicted, it will be the first in 13 years. It will also be the first time Ottawa has slid into the red from a surplus since 1970-1971.
That's despite the fact that Mr. Flaherty – a soldier in Mike Harris's Common Sense Revolution – declared several times this year that he wouldn't be the finance minister who oversees the return of deficits."
[updated Wed Nov 19 17:26:02 EST 2008]
19 Nov 17:26
48 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
hollinm
It is far too early to determine what the trend will be in the coming days/weeks.
However, there is one thing I have noted. The government is being much more proactive about promoting and explaining their agenda. That is a good thing, The Libs, NDP and Bloc will have a hard time getting away with their sometimes outrageous comments about what the government is doing when government ministers are front and centre.
It is also clear we as a country are in for a tough ride and the government is signalling that everyday. They are making the right noises and that is good. Keep Canadians in the loop.
Canadians will decide whether they are doing the right things over time and not the opposition parties.
[updated Wed Nov 19 17:58:24 EST 2008]
19 Nov 17:58
3 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Tom Good
It all goes to show that elections are related to the stock market whose prime motivating force is emotion rather than common sense. The volatity of the voter at large is surprising but looking back at recent previous elections it is easy to see those surprising swings when something negative pops up or is deliberately introduced into the election process.
The fact a new Liberal leader is in the offing has to be positive for the Grits. The deficit word is a negative and, seemingly, the electorate expects the Government to have some foolproof crystal ball in these economic times to predict the future begs common sense. One usually has difficulty predicting the future in their own family with stable economic times but governments are supposed to have Extra Sensory Perception ? ? ?Governments are made up of people like you and me with all our flaws but Governments employ a trained Civil Service to give them the best advice possible but even that is not flawless assuming Ministers listen.
Yes, job losses in the manufacturing belt understandably will be a big negative when Government, at this moment, appears to have no plan to implement. This is where the "huge" Unemployment Insurance surplus should be readily available to give some relief. The melt down of the Alberta Heritage Fund must be a real shocker to the core area of Conservative support and a further discussion of a cutback in Alberta's per capita spending must be another shocker for Conservativeland. It would seem to me common sense to cut back provincial spending when the bottom has been knocked out of your revenues.
I believe another consideration has to have come out of the Winnipeg Policy Convention where the far right of the party---the Reform element--- indicated they were alive and well and they "would have their way" if at all possible-----if not now, then in the future. They got the press and, in my opinion, they have somewhat devalued the Conservative persona in the eyes of the electorate at large. I referred to this particular aspect as Harper's threat from within.
One positive is that time heals all and the electorate has a short term memory and usually no long term memory.
[updated Wed Nov 19 18:26:04 EST 2008]
19 Nov 18:26
38 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
westerner
The next election is a long way off. What was the purpose of this poll? Seems rather useless except for a few political junkies to argue over.
[updated Wed Nov 19 18:41:12 EST 2008]
19 Nov 18:41
8 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Warning Warning do not listen to any Liberals or the EDC about exporting to China, Civil unrest is happening and Canadian (BC) companies are not getting paid by Chinese Banks, Do not let a Chinese in Canada scam you about investing or visiting China!!!!!
Stay Away For Your Own Good!!!!!!!
[updated Wed Nov 19 22:24:57 EST 2008]
19 Nov 22:24
1 reply so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Bernie
I was a little surprised with this poll and the direction it's going in. It's immaterial . It has no significance now that the election is over , other than to satisfy the curiosity of some of us (me included). It has no intrinsic value.
Nik's comments on the Mike Duffy show were spot on. So I won't rehash them here.
I cannot help but think that Harper's response to the economy crisis and reaction to the convention in Winnipeg will be eroding his popularity over time.
As Tom so often reminds us governments engineer their own demise.
[updated Thu Nov 20 08:28:01 EST 2008]
20 Nov 08:28
7 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Simeon
Rubbish ! The "Greens" at 10% more like .01%.This poll is worthy of the trash bin.
[updated Thu Nov 20 08:35:01 EST 2008]
20 Nov 08:35
1 reply so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Non-aligned in Toronto
Certainly some of the Liberal rebound will be as a result of the Dion resignation, although I think voters may well find Rae and Ignatieff equally unpalatable. I think the drop in Conservative support is largely Harper's pre-election comments about recession, deficits and the market (bargain hunting anyone? the markets off another 3000 points since then!) coming back on him.
We are pretty much back to where we were a month before the election. A lot will depend, going forward, on how Harper conducts himself and his Party in Parliament over the next few months, and on his first budget.
[updated Thu Nov 20 12:01:20 EST 2008]
20 Nov 12:01
No replies yet. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Martha Hall Findley is acting like a bit of an ass in Parliament right now at 11:41 am pacific do you not think, Habs was this your choice for Leader of the Liberal Party, I think so!
[updated Thu Nov 20 14:42:09 EST 2008]