Last night’s tracking showed a noticeable jump in Bloc support in Quebec coinciding with attacks on Stephen Harper’s views and comments related to culture.
Results of today’s CPAC-Nanos tracking poll show the Tories holding strong nationally at 37% support. The Liberals trail 11 points behind at 26%, followed by the NDP at 21%, the Bloc Québécois at 9% and the Green Party at 7 %. The Bloc Québécois has regained ground in Quebec, while the Conservatives and Liberals remain statistically tied in the province of Ontario. At 39%, Stephen Harper heads Canada’s choice for Prime Minister, followed by Jack Layton at 17%. Stéphane Dion drops to 11%, with Elizabeth May scoring 5% and Gilles Duceppe 3%.
Tune in to Prime Time Politics with Peter Van Dusen tonight at 8 pm (EST) on CPAC for a discussion of our latest polling results. For more detailed information on the methodology and the statistical results visit the Nanos Research website at http://www.nanosresearch.com.
Methodology and Results
A national random telephone survey is conducted nightly by Nanos Research throughout the campaign. Each evening a new group of 400 eligible voters is interviewed. The daily tracking figures are based on a three-day rolling sample comprised of 1,200 interviews. To update the tracking a new day of interviewing is added and the oldest day dropped. The margin of accuracy is ±2.8%, 19 times out of 20 for 1,200 random interviews.
The numbers in parenthesis denote the change from the previous Nanos Research Survey completed on September 22, 2008.
Question: If a FEDERAL election were held today, could you please rank your top two current local voting preferences? (First ranked reported)
Committed Voters - Canada (N=1,003, MoE ± 3.1%, 19 times out of 20)
- Conservative Party 37 (-1)
- Liberal Party 26 (-1)
- NDP 21 (NC)
- BQ 9% (+1)
- Green Party 7% (+1)
- Undecided 16% (-1)
Question: Of the following individuals, who do you think would make the best Prime Minister? [Rotate] (N=1,201,MoE ± 2.8%, 19 times out of 20)
- Conservative leader Stephen Harper 39% (+2)
- NDP leader Jack Layton 17% (-1)
- Liberal leader Stephane Dion 11% (-2)
- Green Party leader Elizabeth May 5% (+1)
- Bloc Quebecois leader Gilles Duceppe 3% (NC)
- None of them 9% (-1)
- Unsure 16% (+1)
Question: Which of the federal leaders would you best describe as:
- The most trustworthy leader
- The most competent leader
- The leader with the best vision for Canada’s future
[Leadership Index Score - Daily roll-up of all three measures]
- Stephen Harper 108 (-5)
- Jack Layton 47 (+3)
- Stephane Dion 32 (-6)
- Gilles Duceppe 19 (+6)
- Elizabeth May 18 (+5)
What do you think?
Cheers, NJN
Remember to rate the views of others - to allow us to recognize the opinion leaders in our national conversation.
Individuals with the top ratings make it to Nik’s Leaderboard
Most Read Comments
Highest Rated Comments
Definately a spike for bloc support in quebec. A mistake on harper's part to blo... more
Foxer (British Columbia) 24 Sep 14:15
Majority! Majority! Majority!... more
hsingh (British Columbia) 24 Sep 14:18
Yes it is a spike for Bloc support, but according to a reporter from LaPresse mo... more
Rosebud in BC (British Columbia) 24 Sep 14:41
That's possible - i think it will generally affect them in quebec a little for ... more
Foxer (British Columbia) 24 Sep 14:45
If the Tories do have a hidden agenda - stuff they won't talk about but would do... more
Lex Llewdor (British Columbia) 24 Sep 15:23
I agree. Ridculous to be spending our tax dollars to air Wheel of Fortune and Je... more
kschell (Ontario) 24 Sep 15:29
Comments
Foxer
Definately a spike for bloc support in quebec. A mistake on harper's part to blow off the funding cuts like that. He's right of course - they DID increase funding overall - but now he looks a little callous towards the arts community.
It'll probably be short lived, but only if he comes forward with a much more positive message for quebec to repair this mistake.
Libs down again and the ndp isn't - thats still within the margin of error of course, but it's not what the libs wanted to see. They're within 5 points now.
[updated Wed Sep 24 14:15:54 EDT 2008]
24 Sep 14:15
36 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
hsingh
Majority! Majority! Majority!
[updated Wed Sep 24 14:18:28 EDT 2008]
24 Sep 14:18
26 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Foxer
Interesting dion's leadership scores fell again last night. Sooner or later that's going to translate into very bad news for dion - he SHOULD have had a bump from his platform release but instead it looks like it was not well received by people at all. I think people really don't trust what he says.
That may be in part to the fact liberals have broken promises so often - but I also have to wonder if it isn't due to the vagueness and complexity of the liberal plan. It's a very complex plan that's very short on details, making it hard to understand even for people who study that kind of stuff for a living.
I think a lot of people look at that and immediately assume the politician is hiding something. Regardless of the politician.
Dion should have spelt things out much more clearly - like 'how much carbon will the green tax save'? Simple things like that are very important to people.
I think dion's problem is he's a concept guy - but really falls short on details.
[updated Wed Sep 24 14:52:12 EDT 2008]
24 Sep 14:52
3 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
westerner (suspended)
This poll and many others appear to be holding very steady for the Conservatives and the Best PM numbers show Harper (39%) increasing his lead over Dion (11%). Not in majority territory yet but would deliver a solid minority government.
[updated Wed Sep 24 14:59:19 EDT 2008]
24 Sep 14:59
5 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
MSH
This is the electoral equivalent to World War II, and very unfortunately for Dion and the Liberals they find themselves playing the role of Germany, fighting a losing battle on two fronts: To the west he has hit an immovable wall in the "Commonwealth/American" Tories, and to the east where he has previously taken ground easily his army, starving on meagre campaign rations, now faces the resurgent "Soviet" NDP. (apologies to Liberal supporters/apologists who might see an inference to Hitler when I mention Dion--Dion is certainly not the equivalent to the notoriously evil Hitler, nor do I mean to imply we'd see negative consequences of that scale should Dion become PM--I very simply mean to compare the tactical situations of the war and the election campaign).
The lukewarm reaction to the Liberal platform may be the death knell. It seems not to dispel the image painted in the Tory "not worth the risk" attack ads but instead give them credibility. This week we've seen inconsistent budgetary estimates (casting doubt on the "revenue neutrality" of the "green shift" plan) as well as inconsistency in philosophy (a green shift plan that is supposed to be "tough on polluters" but is easy on "Ontario polluters" with breaks on gasoline and other carbon taxes that would impact that provinces manufacturing and transportation sectors..and now a promise to rescind income trust taxes...perhaps to bribe western voters with the biggest beef over the subject?).
Being an Albertan disgruntled with the Tories pulling a Trudeau-style turnabout on an economic policy in the trust tax grab, Dion's proposal to reverse the tax seems appealing...but being an Albertan I also view the Liberals with deep distrust--even more so than I have with Flaherty's brain trust. Trusts are a good vehicle to fund income-producing-but-depreciating assets, and making them tax free would promote the exploitation of established oil and gas fields to exhaustion, with the income being distributed to unit holders given priority over investment in new "greener" technology.
Since that aspect of an income trust tax cut seems to run counter to the "green shift" I just KNOW there has to be a big asterisk on that platform plank written in invisible ink. I suspect other trusts like REITs will benefit fully but royalty trusts will be slapped with some other punitive measure of a sort that would make Trudeau and his middle finger proud. I think many westerners have been coloured "unimpressed". The Tories "not worth the risk" attack campaign is "negative done right" and very shrewd and sharp. It won't make voters love them but it reinforces Harper's economic track record.
Canada might be struggling but we've been doing much better than the US in the past year under Harper's leadership, and without a doubt it is the US-led credit crunch and not Harper policies that sparked the downturn seen round the globe. We here see that and view a PM with an economist background and pragmatic approach as the safest, if not ideal, choice leading into potential recessionary times.
In the east "Comrade Layton" is looking pretty confident too...and he is running a surprisingly sharp campaign, notwithstanding what he..ahem..might've been smoking. Not since Broadbent ran the politburo have they sustained support in the 20s for any great time. Whether or not the NDP's policies are rooted in reality, at least they are consistent and clear and different from the government (at a time when the Liberals' elite sound rather NDPish and the Tories are increasingly harder to distinguish from disgruntled former Martinites still in the Liberal tent)--very much what voters crave at the moment. Those t-shirts with the Dion Liberal voting record...genius strategy!
With "der Führer Dion" fighting on two fronts and presenting a platform that is a bit hastily put together the Liberals are looking a bit desperate. The game is changing--a majority for the Tories is still very questionable, but now the NDP are edging towards statistical tie with Liberals. Strategic voting will not work for Dion at that point...not if voters want a minority that would REALLY keep the Tories in check.
[updated Wed Sep 24 16:24:08 EDT 2008]
24 Sep 16:24
2 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Don't Harper's Wars on Terror/Crime Violate UN Conventions? Look at these:
Article 37 (rights of kids)
Parties shall ensure that:
(a) No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Neither capital punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility of release shall be imposed for offences committed by persons below eighteen years of age;
Now, let's not even talk about Omar Kadr, whom Mr. Harper has left twisting (and tortured) in the wind down at Gitmo. Or his age of sexual consent madness.
14 yeal olds! 15 year olds! What can this man be thinking?
I'll tell you what, he doesn't care about right and wrong. He doesn't care about facts. He's an ideological freak with a hidden agenda. To quote Mr. Harper, we won't recognize Canada when's he's done with it.
That's why ABC or ABH has to take hold, and fast.
[updated Wed Sep 24 20:07:46 EDT 2008]
24 Sep 20:07
51 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.